tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24212995.post2147841016955628066..comments2008-09-22T15:55:05.199-05:00Roland Doddshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17819155097718124744noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24212995.post-64430952744082836652008-09-22T09:39:00.000-05:002008-09-22T09:39:00.000-05:00Thanks for the link Rolandjams o donnellhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17315325008175184363noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24212995.post-9677192166141333702008-09-21T19:07:00.000-05:002008-09-21T19:07:00.000-05:00Yes, in this sense they're correct: their caricature of McCain is just like their caricature of Bush.kelliehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03503738414917449549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24212995.post-40776618617958484962008-09-21T18:59:00.000-05:002008-09-21T18:59:00.000-05:00I agree Kellie, but I think those saying McCain is just another Bush term aren’t really trying to make a rational argument to begin with. Saying they are one and the same is just a campaign tactic to link McCain to an unpopular president.Roland Doddshttp://www.blogger.com/profile/17819155097718124744noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24212995.post-22565654774105549572008-09-21T17:51:00.000-05:002008-09-21T17:51:00.000-05:00Likewise, thanks for the link.<BR/><BR/>I liked Daniel's piece too. What strikes me is that Bush isn't Bush anymore. A few things happened between saying no to nation building in 2000 and <A HREF="http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/georgepacker/2008/09/by-chance-three.html" REL="nofollow">where he is now</A>. Not enough change for me, but significant nonetheless. So which Bush is McCain supposed to be?kelliehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/03503738414917449549noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-24212995.post-31424052350562330352008-09-21T15:46:00.000-05:002008-09-21T15:46:00.000-05:00Thanks for the plug.Daniel Starkhttp://thestarktenet.blogspot.comnoreply@blogger.com