You neoCONs are running scared!

2011-12-29T10:57:30.195-06:00

Bullshit on Matt's part. To try and argue that...

2011-12-27T10:30:47.556-06:00

Bullshit on Matt's part. To try and argue that the NWO conspiracy garbage is some rational political position is downright stupid. Bush may have referenced the term when discussing post cold war, but he didn't mean it in the Paul/Alex jones way.

We are not electing a priest or a dad or a god; we...

2011-12-26T20:35:29.895-06:00

We are not electing a priest or a dad or a god; we are electing someone to rein in the big-brother government.
I don't care if he is racist, sexist, gay, or ugly.
Ron Paul is the best one to change this USA to a better and freer place.
If he wins, I might even move back to the USA and feel free again.

Sorry - I could have just linked to this: http:/...

2011-12-24T23:12:12.703-06:00

Sorry - I could have just linked to this:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/New_world_order_(politics)

Not sure if that Bermas documentary is the one that had the fascinating montage of clips from people on TV using the phrase or not. May have been Paul Joseph Watson or somebody else's.

- matt

Hi, I don't wish to get into an argument abo...

2011-12-24T22:55:42.242-06:00

Hi,

I don't wish to get into an argument about whether Ron Paul is a great candidate, or even if the president is an extremely important office for everyone to worship and make a big deal about constantly 24/7/365 (I'm obviously a non-voter), but I DO want to point out that the term, the phrase, "new world order" is NOT just used by conspiracy theorists! It's not just used by fans of Alex Jones or the John Birch Society, Ron Paul, etc. It's honestly been used by quite a few people, and you insinuate in your article that any and all talk about this sort of thing comes only from them or is merely their jargon.

For instance, in the Jason Bermas documentary, "Invisible Empire" (if I'm remember the right one), he has clips of a lot of officials, politicians, people in the media, etc., using the phrase:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO24XmP1c5E

Jason Bermas is the guy that did Loose Change which has also been heavily promoted by Alex Jones. Not trying to say that you need to listen to Jason Bermas, Alex Jones or Ron Paul. Just gets on my nerves that people still write about this phrase as something that only comes out of conspiracy theorists' mouths.

Also saying that a candidate has associations with a certain society (John Birch) or "right wing extremists" doesn't make for a good argument. It doesn't really paint a picture in my mind (unless perhaps it's a message meant only for the choir) because I don't know what you're talking about.

It's a "guilt by association" argument, except you don't describe very well (or at all) who the association is, even though guilt by association is usually considered a bad form of argument anyway.

Personally I think people put too much stock in the President and he isn't supposed to be that powerful of a guy. If Obama stays president, it's fine, but he's not supposed to be a super-powerful guy, and neither is Ron Paul, or Bush, or Clinton, whoever. I kind of want *anybody* to be president because I don't understand why people need great leaders to fix everything for them anyway. Maybe I really am that much of a "libertarian" but I don't think about my political positions much or even understand this kind of thinking. (I think I came over here from clicking a Simply Jew link off a link from BinnallofAmerica.com).

I don't know why presidencies are so important to people, but they are! They are looking for a king or a dictator, a great national leader to save everything. Ann Coulter talks about this in her book "Demonic," I think?

A final thing, sorry about the long comment, maybe I'll just email it -- I don't see why racism is held as so important to people. On the one hand I don't like that people are racist, but I don't see it as a problem unless it's violent, if it's actually criminal, but then in that case the important thing is the crime, not the reason for doing the crime.

A problem with everyone being less racist is that everyone will mix together and there will be less race differences. That's if you LIKE the race differences. If you find them beautiful. But then if you say this you get accused of (or assumed to be) some kind of closed racist that's trying to put a nice spin on things, because nobody seems to trust what the other says at face value and they're always looking for hidden meanings in things (liberals do this to conservatives and conservatives do this to liberals).

So for the record (not that the record for me probably matters), I don't care if people think I'm racist -- now or in the future. I don't get why that's such a stigma and so important to people.

Ughh, what a crazy message to leave for people this Christmas Eve. Well the person I'm probably leaving this message to probably isn't Christian and I have no idea what blog this is, and I ain't Christian, either, but...

Comments on But, I am a Liberal!: Ron Paul: The "Just Don't Look" Candidate - Part 2...

You neoCONs are running scared!

Bullshit on Matt's part. To try and argue that...

We are not electing a priest or a dad or a god; we...

Sorry - I could have just linked to this: http:/...

Hi, I don't wish to get into an argument abo...